Effort creates the most impact when the diagnosis comes first.
Assessment-led work for organizations scaling SAFe and adopting AI — 25 years of closing the gap between where an organization is and where its strategy requires it to be.
Clients
Absa Bank · Barclays · Deloitte · Capgemini · Owens Corning · Vodafone · JCI · JLL Technologies · Gartner · Pfizer · Microsoft
Most transformation programs fail the diagnosis before they fail the execution. Organizations adopt frameworks, hire consultants, and run training — without first measuring whether the intervention matches the actual capability gap.
The approach is assessment-led: systematic evaluation of capability, mapped to specific strategic objectives. Every finding connects to a leverage point. Every recommendation identifies where a focused intervention creates outsized results — including $50M in documented savings at a major financial institution.
Where the work focuses
SAFe & Portfolio
Multi-ART programs usually break at the portfolio layer, not the team layer. That’s where most of this work happens.
SAFe & LPM →AI Strategy & Governance
The gap is rarely the model. It’s governance, data foundations, and whether the organization can operationalize what it builds.
AI →Organizational Practices
Process friction and leadership misalignment produce similar symptoms. The fix is different for each — worth knowing which one you have.
Practices →Principles
Frameworks change more often than the principles underneath them. That’s what the assessment actually measures against.
Principles →SAFe · 11
SA · SP · SSM · SASM · POPM · APM · RTE · SPC · LPM · ARCH · SDP
ICAgile · 3
ICE‑EC · ICP‑CAT · ICP‑ENT
Kanban University · 4
TKP · KMP · KCP · AKT
Curious where you’d land?
See how the assessment maps capability gaps to what to fix first.
Start the conversation
If you already have a sense of where the gap is, or you’d rather find out first — either way is a fine place to begin.